Action point 14 - Strategy to ensure the integrity of excipients
Last update: 04/07/2024
Background
During its meeting on 13 December 2022, the SEARN Steering group requested that a capacity building program is set up on the issue of the integrity of starting materials and the supply chain, in the context of the persisting issues of substandard oral liquid medicines.
Since October 2022, the WHO has shared numerous Medical Product Alerts reporting contamination of liquid oral medicines with diethylene glycol (DEG) and /or ethylene glycol (EG), which are toxic to humans when consumed and can prove fatal. On 23 January 2023, WHO issued an urgent call to action to countries to prevent, detect and respond to incidents of substandard and falsified medical products.
This series of serious events has triggered considerable concerns in the region and at the global level. Further, although similar events contributed to laying down the basis of modern medical products regulation over one hundred years ago, the regular repetition of similar tragedies suggest that regulatory systems can be further strengthened to address this issue.
Considering the above, the Assembly created in January 2023 a dedicated action point (AP14) in the SEARN workplan, led by Working Group 1 (WG1) Quality.
Scope and definitions
The WHO Good Manufacturing Practices and the Good storage and distribution practices provides the following definitions:
- Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) (TRS 986). Any substance or mixture of substances intended to be used in the manufacture of a pharmaceutical dosage form and that, when so used, becomes an active ingredient of that pharmaceutical dosage form. Such substances are intended to furnish pharmacological activity or other direct effect in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease or to affect the structure and function of the body.
- Contamination (TRS 986). The undesired introduction of impurities of a chemical or microbiological nature, or of foreign matter, into or on to a starting material or intermediate during production, sampling, packaging or repackaging, storage or transport.
- Cross-contamination (TRS 986). Contamination of a starting material, intermediate product or finished product with another starting material or product during production.
- Falsified product (WHO Good storage and distribution practices for medical products). A product that has been deliberately and/or fraudulently misrepresented as to its identity, composition or source. Such deliberate/fraudulent misrepresentation refers to any substitution, adulteration or reproduction of an authorized product, or the manufacture of a product that is not an authorized product. “Identity” shall refer to the name, labelling or packaging or to documents that support the authenticity of an authorized product. “Composition” shall refer to any ingredient or component of the product in accordance with applicable specifications authorized/recognized by the national regulatory authority (NRA). “Source” shall refer to the identification, including name and address, of the marketing authorization holder, manufacturer, importer, exporter, distributor or retailer, as applicable
- Finished product (TRS 986). A finished dosage form that has undergone all stages of manufacture, including packaging in its final container and labelling.
- Good distribution practices (GDP) (WHO Good storage and distribution practices for medical products). That part of quality assurance that ensures that the quality of a medical product is maintained by means of adequate control of the numerous activities that occur during the trade and distribution process, as well as providing a tool to secure the distribution system from falsified, unapproved, illegally imported, stolen, substandard, adulterated and/ or misbranded medical products.
- Good manufacturing practices (GMP) (WHO Good storage and distribution practices for medical products). That part of quality assurance that ensures that pharmaceutical products are consistently produced and controlled to the quality standards appropriate to their intended use and as required by the marketing authorization.
- Material (WHO Good storage and distribution practices for medical products). A general term used to denote starting materials (APIs and excipients), reagents, solvents, process aids, intermediates, packaging materials and labelling materials.
- Pharmaceutical excipients (TRS 885). Substances, other than the active ingredient, which have been appropriately evaluated for safety and are included in a drug delivery system to: aid in the processing of the drug delivery system during its manufacture; protect, support or enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient acceptability; assist in product identification; or enhance any other attribute of the overall safety and effectiveness of the drug during storage or use.
- Starting material (TRS 986). Any substance of a defined quality used in the production of a pharmaceutical product, but excluding packaging materials.
- Substandard products (WHO Good storage and distribution practices for medical products). “Substandard” medical products (also called “out of specification”) are authorized by NRAs but fail to meet either national or international quality standards or specifications – or, in some cases, both.
Considering the issues which triggered this work, and the pre-existing regulatory mechanisms, it was agreed to focus this strategy on ensuring the integrity of excipients, with adequate consideration for substandard and falsified excipients. The strategy should in general look after all excipients, favoring effective implementation of what already exists. The strategy should also include a focus and recommend actions on excipients which may include impurities posing serious risks to public health. To date, only EG and DEG were identified for prioritization.
General objective
To ensure the integrity of excipients through a risk-based approach.
Overview of the excipients supply chain
Excipients are an essential component of drug formulations, and any deviation or contamination in their quality or quantity can affect the drug's performance, stability, and safety.
The supply chain and life cycle
The supply chain for excipients is a complex network of activities that involves multiple players, including excipient manufacturers, distributors, brokers, re-packers and end-users such as pharmaceutical manufacturers.
The supply chain typically consists of the following stages:
Raw material sourcing: Excipients can be derived from various sources, including natural, synthetic, or semi-synthetic materials. Raw materials are sourced from suppliers and undergo quality control measures to ensure their suitability for excipient manufacturing.
Excipient manufacturing and quality control: Excipient manufacturers use various processing techniques to produce excipients in different forms, such as powders, liquids, and gels. The manufacturing process involves multiple steps, including mixing, granulation, drying, and milling, followed by quality control testing to ensure the excipients meet the required specifications.
Excipient distribution: Excipients are distributed to brokers, distributors, and end-users such as pharmaceutical manufacturers. Excipient distributors may be local or global, and they often maintain inventories of excipients to provide quick and reliable delivery to customers.
Storage and transportation: Excipients must be stored and transported under controlled conditions to prevent contamination or degradation. Excipient manufacturers and distributors use various techniques to maintain the stability and quality of excipients during storage and transportation, such as temperature control, moisture control, and packaging. Excipient manufacturers, distributors, traders, and end users should follow WHO guidelines for good storage and distribution practice (GSDP)
End-use manufacturing: Pharmaceutical manufacturers use excipients to formulate their products, such as tablets, capsules, creams, injectables and other dosage forms. The excipients must meet specific quality and safety standards to ensure the safety and efficacy of the final product.
Overall, the supply chain for excipients involves a complex multi-layer global network of activities that require coordination and collaboration between various players to ensure the quality, safety, and reliability of excipients. The increasing complexity of the global supply chain brings with it an increased risk in excipient security. This requires implementation of prevention, detection, and response strategies and actions, relying on coordination and collaboration between various players.
Good Practices for Excipients
(As identified in July 2023)
General principles and references
WHO Good manufacturing practices: supplementary guidelines for the manufacture of pharmaceutical excipients was initially published in 1999 under TRS 885, Annex-5. This guideline is currently being reviewed by the Norms and Standards for Pharmaceutical Team, HQ, Geneva. In view of the ongoing quality issues with some of the pharmaceutical products containing contaminated excipients, the revised guideline will provide clear expectations from the excipient manufacturers using risk-based approach.
Manufacturers must ensure the raw materials procured from appropriate supply chains meet the technical, regulatory, requirements to maintain the safety, efficacy and quality of the finished products. One of the approaches could be the inclusion of critical factor that determines the safety of the raw materials through vendor validation/ formalized quality risk assessment. Further guidance is provided in the
In addition to the supplementary guideline for GMP for pharmaceutical excipients, the excipient manufacturers should refer to the following guidelines:
- WHO TRS 986, Annex-2 (Main GMP principles)
- WHO TRS 1025, Annex-7 Good Storage & Distribution Practices
- WHO TRS 957, Annex-5 Good Distribution Practices
- WHO TRS 1033, Annex-4 Guideline on data integrity
- WHO TRS 996 - Annex 5: WHO good data and record management practices (to be updated)
- WHO TRS 1033 Annex 4 – WHO guideline on data integrity (2021 or 2022)
- WHO Good Trade and Distribution Practices for Pharmaceutical Starting Materials
All parties involved in the distribution of pharmaceutical products have a responsibility to ensure that the quality of pharmaceutical products and the integrity of the distribution chain is maintained throughout the distribution process from the site of the manufacturer to the entity responsible for dispensing or providing the product to the patient or his or her agent.
All entities involved in the distribution process should apply due diligence with adherence to the principles of GDP, for example, in procedures relating to traceability and in recognition of security risks.
Repackaging of pharmaceutical excipients should not be allowed unless it is carried out in a controlled environment meeting the GMP requirement.
IPEC
The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council (IPEC) is an organisation of excipient manufacturers, distributors and finished drug product makers intended to promote the best use of excipients in medicines.
IPEC has produced a number of documents which may be relevant to the scope of this work:
- The 2020 Position Paper on Data Integrity for Pharmaceutical Grade Excipients aims to facilitate the development of appropriate strategies by all parties to manage the integrity of critical data in order to provide confidence in the quality and GMP compliance of the excipient.
- The 2019 Position Paper on Supply Chain Security of Pharmaceutical Grade Excipients is intended to provide all parties of the supply chain with support and to highlight available tools.
- A 2015 Position Paper supporting Third Party Audits and Certification Programmes rather than self-audits or audits by excipients manufacturers.
- The 2022 IPEC Certificate of Analysis (CoA) Guide, intended to serve as a guide for the preparation and appropriate use of a Certificate of Analysis (COA) for pharmaceutical excipients, standardize the content and suggest a format for COAs for excipients, and to define the roles and responsibilities for the excipient manufacturer and distributor.
- The 2022 Joint Good Manufacturing Practices Guide For Pharmaceutical Excipients which was revised to incorporate the principles of risk assessment.
- The 2021 IPEC Good Distribution Practices (GDP) Audit Guide which was developed as a consolidation of several GDP audit guides to assist the users in evaluating the practices and quality systems of distributors who sell, store or repackage pharmaceutical excipients.
- The 2020 Excipient Information Package User Guide and Template is intended to facilitate the excipient supplier’s sharing of information with the user in a standardized way
- The 2020 Qualification of Excipients for Use in Pharmaceuticals Guide & Checklist which is meant as a guide for excipient qualification (i.e. to establish the information needed to support the development of products and marketing materials used as excipients, as well as to describe the necessary information for excipient use by pharmaceutical companies).
APEC
The complexity of supply chain, both in raw materials as well as pharmaceutical products are involving many parties, such as manufacturers and trading partners (distributors, brokers, traders, and agents).
The APEC Supply Chain Security Toolkit includes concerns about the importance of ensuring the integrity of raw materials in the supply chain, from API, starting materials, excipients, primary packaging, to secondary packaging materials. One of the challenges faced in supply chain management is the many handovers of different material owners; therefore, procurement process of raw materials, becomes a critical point in the supply chain.
Both API and other raw materials have risks in the supply chain, with different levels of risk. This toolkit has also identified risks from raw material procurement, from direct procurement with the lowest risk, to procurement from various types of raw material suppliers, ranging from distributors, brokers, traders, and agents
Risk-based approach for excipients
Formalised risk assessment for excipients
In March 2015 the European Commission published such Guidelines entitled “Guidelines on the formalized risk assessment for ascertaining the appropriate GMP for excipients of medicinal products for human use” according to which the manufacturing authorization holders have now to perform a formalized risk assessment of the excipients used in their drug products and of the excipients manufacturer where they purchase the excipients.
Based on this, a control strategy has to be established in order to manage and mitigate the risks of the use of the excipients Article 47 of Directive 2001 83 /EC provides that “The Commission shall adopt guidelines on the formalized risk assessment for ascertaining the appropriate good manufacturing practice for excipients.
To perform the formalized risk assessment, the medical product manufacturer should refer to ICH Q9 especially tools (such as HACCP) as well as other QRM guidelines such as WHO TRS on QRM, PIC/S Annex 20.
Based on the determination of GMP requirement for an excipient manufacturer, a gap analysis should be performed by the FPP manufacturer and evidence should be maintained If excipient manufacturers are subjected to any GMP and quality system requirement in certain jurisdictions, it should be considered.
Based on the formalized risk assessment, the medical product manufacturer establishes the risk profile of the excipient, accordingly, establishes GMP requirements for the pharmaceutical excipient manufacturers (e g GMP for APIs or GMP for FPPs or GMP for sterile FPPs).
PIC/S (PI 045 1 1 July 2018 also published Guidelines on the formalized risk assessment for ascertaining the appropriate GMP for excipients of Medical Products for human use.
Stakeholders may also refer to the US FDA Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) which lists substances that are generally recognized, among qualified experts, as having been adequately shown to be safe under the conditions of its intended use.
Further, It is a usual pharma industry practice to sample excipients using a statistical approach (such as under root n+1). A risk-based approach should be adopted by the FPP manufacturers to sample 100% (like for APIs) excipients where there is a potential risk of contamination, cross-contamination, and mix-up. This can be determined based on the manufacturing process of a certain excipient. In addition, based on the composition of the FPP, the FPP manufacturer should take more samples of those excipients whose % is higher than other excipients.
Similarly, it is a common industry practice to perform “paper assessment” of excipient manufacturers instead of performing “on-site” assessment to have more insight about the state of the excipient manufacturers.
Risk factors and risk mitigation measures to consider
Risk factors to consider include:
- Risk of the excipient/impurity, including route of synthesis (like for the APIs) from excipient manufacturers and assess potential risk of contamination, degradation or impurities during the manufacturing, storage and transportation of excipients.
- Excipients most at risk of falsification (also considering difficulties of detection)
- Manufacturing site producing various excipients with little or no cleaning validation
- Supply Chain – which parts are the most vulnerable
- Data integrity – valididy / traceability of the data
- Legality/history of compliance from the manufacturers
- The pharmaceutical dosage form and the function of the excipients
- shortage of excipients
Risk mitigations to consider include:
- vendor qualification and close attention to the procurement, handling (storage & usage), and distribution stages
- Effective testing of excipients for contaminants
- Periodic evaluation of high risk excipients suppliers trend analysis
Specific considerations for prioritized issues
It would likely be impossible to implement the full GMP requirements on excipient manufacturers. Based on the tragic incidents that took place in the past as well as in the recent past, a list of excipients may be considered for additional scrutiny. For examples, pharmaceutical excipients used in pediatric formulations (regardless of their dosage forms) should be prioritized for full testing.
During the Regional Workshop on Ensuring Quality of Medicines from Contaminated Substances Jakarta, Indonesia, 2–4 May 2023, NRAs were invited to implement a risk Based approach to address the current situation, e.g. through focusing on manufacturers of oral liquid form. This may be facilitated by various existing tools, including the toolkit for EG/DEG contaminations developed by the USP. Especially, inspection programmes should control the effective implementation of testing for batches and high-risk excipients.
NRAs were also recommended to consider implementing a formalised risk assessment for high-risk excipients, which may require both capacity building for NRAs and for manufacturers.
Member States are encouraged to facilitate the sharing of inspection reports for oral liquid manufacturers with each other, which may be achieved through publishing summary of inspection reports for manufacturers of oral liquid medicines and urgently establishing memorandums of understanding (MoU) between NRAs. NRAs should also ensure that their websites include key information such as GMP status and validity.
Such actions are required to enable reliance for medicines produced in foreign countries. When sufficient and satisfactory information on Good Manufacturing Practices is not available, relying on countries should apply a risk-based approach considering the current risk and the benefits of individual products.
US FDA Guidance on the testing of High-Risk Drug Components for Diethylene Glycol and Ethylene Glycol
In May 2023, the US FDA published a guidance on Testing of Glycerin, Propylene Glycol, Maltitol Solution, Hydrogenated Starch Hydrolysate, Sorbitol Solution, and Other High-Risk Drug Components for Diethylene Glycol and Ethylene Glycol.
This document notes that the historical cases of EG/DEG contaminations shared the following similarities:
- ‘The manufacturers of the liquid drug products that contained contaminated glycerin did not perform full identity testing on the glycerin raw material, including tests to quantify the amount of DEG present and to verify the purity of the glycerin received.
- The manufacturers of the liquid drug products containing contaminated glycerin relied on the certificate of analysis (COA) provided by the supplier of the glycerin.
- The origin of the glycerin was not readily apparent from the COA. The COA obtained by the manufacturers of the liquid drug products was often a copy of a COA on the letterhead of the distributor from whom they had purchased the glycerin and not the COA provided by the original manufacturer of the glycerin. The chain of custody or distribution history of the glycerin was also not readily known, often because the glycerin might have been sold multiple times between its manufacture and its use in manufacturing the finished drug product’.
The guidance highlights certain key provisions considered critical, and list specific recommendations for EG/DEG contaminations.
Market control and surveillance of excipients
General considerations
It is critical for countries, regulators, and industry to implement pragmatic and evidence based policies and strategies for market control and surveillance of pharmaceutical excipients without affecting access and costs of pharmaceutical products.
The TRS 929 - Annex 4: WHO guidelines for sampling of pharmaceutical products and related materials, 2005 provides general guidance on surveying the national markets for the quality of drug products in accordance with national drug quality surveillance programmes for marketed products, whether registered for sale or compounded in pharmacies.
Critical measures for ensuring the quality, safety, and efficacy of pharmaceutical products through maintenance of robust market control and surveillance of pharmaceutical excipients, can reduce the risk of harm to patients and ensure the availability of safe and effective medicines. These may include;
- Quality standards: Countries and regulators should establish and enforce quality standards for excipients. This includes setting specifications for excipient quality, purity, and identity, and ensuring that these standards are met through testing and certification.
- Supplier qualification: Pharmaceutical manufacturers should ensure that their excipient suppliers are qualified and meet the necessary quality standards. This includes conducting supplier audits, evaluating supplier performance, and monitoring supplier compliance with quality standards.
- Traceability and documentation: Regulators and industry should require the implementation of robust traceability systems to track the movement of excipients throughout the supply chain. This includes maintaining accurate documentation of excipient origins, processing, testing, and distribution.
- Risk management: Countries, regulators, and industry should implement risk management strategies to identify and mitigate potential risks to excipient quality and safety. This includes conducting risk assessments, implementing risk mitigation measures, and monitoring for emerging risks.
- Surveillance and reporting: Regulators and industry should establish systems for surveillance and reporting of excipient quality issues. This includes monitoring adverse events associated with excipient use and conducting post-market surveillance to detect any issues with excipient quality or safety.
Further, excipient manufacturers should report excipients recalls to the appropriate authorities of applicable Member States, and FPP should immediately report excipients which may present a serious risk to public health (e.g. contamination with EG/DEG) to the NRAs.
Specific considerations for prioritized issues
During the Regional Workshop on Ensuring Quality of Medicines from Contaminated Substances Jakarta, Indonesia, 2–4 May 2023 (please see below), NRAs were invited to implement a risk-based sampling strategy to address the current situation, e.g. focusing on oral liquid medicines.
Each container of each lot of an incoming excipient at risk for EG/DEG contamination should be tested for identity and DEG/EG contamination before it is used in the manufacture of a finished product.
The importance of preparedness was also highlighted, and especially to ensure there is clarity in what should be done if a contaminated product was found. This exercise should consider all steps, from the reporting of the suspected product to the investigation, documentation of the destruction of the product, communication, recall, etc.) and all involved stakeholders. There may also be value in organizing a simulation exercise to ensure the robustness of the system.
Member States were requested to share any information related to contaminated medicines using the WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring System and the South-East Asia Regulatory Network (SEARN) where a strategy on sharing information and guidelines are being discussed (Working group 4, Action point 3 of the workplan). The WHO can facilitate as required.
Considering that the supply chain is international, countries were also encouraged to directly liaise with each other (or facilitated by WHO) and arrange informal meetings between them as part of their investigations.
WHO Scheme for the Certification of Pharmaceutical Starting Materials Moving in International Commerce (SMACS)
Since its establishment, WHO has prioritized ensuring the integrity of pharmaceutical products, introducing mechanisms such as the Certification Scheme on the Quality of Pharmaceutical Products Moving in International Commerce (CPP scheme), a voluntary agreement operational since 1969. While the CPP scheme focuses on finished pharmaceutical products, the quality of starting materials, particularly active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients, demands urgent attention. Triggered by incidents of contamination leading to fatalities, the WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations proposed a new scheme in 1999. Consequently, the WHO Scheme for the Certification of Pharmaceutical Starting Materials Moving in International Commerce (SMACS) was endorsed by the World Health Assembly in 2003. Despite endorsement, SMACS implementation has been limited.
SEARN members considered that this scheme could be helpful to support reliance and ensure the integrity of excipients.
Testing strategies to ensure the integrity of excipients
Risk-based testing
Risk based testing approach should be shouldered by the NCL and/or NRA. To efficiently utilize scare resources, NCL may initiate and continue to testing of raw materials consecutively for several batches (10 or more) until attainment of confidence through trending of its test results. Besides, the NCL may ask manufacturers to provide full data including test results on raw materials of all batches and trend those results. Comparative trending of data of manufacturer with that of NCL test results also will provide solid evidence for the contamination of raw materials. Once sufficient data is generated, NCL may go for risk-based testing through random sampling. Laboratories in the private sector may be strengthened through training on tests of contaminants on raw materials.
Capacity building needs
During the Regional Workshop on Ensuring Quality of Medicines from Contaminated Substances Jakarta, Indonesia, 2–4 May 2023 (please see below), some Member States requested support in accessing reference standards and reagents, and participants requested the WHO to develop International Chemical Reference Substances. Some NRAs also requested urgent capacity building to implement TLC and Gas Chromatography.
NCLs in the region should be strengthened through provision of availability of minimum level equipment like, TLC, HPLCs. Provisions of advanced level equipment like, Gas Chromatography, Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCMS) is to be ensured for laboratories to confirm adequacy of capacity to test EG/DEG or any other contaminants/impurities in the raw materials.
- NCL staff should be properly trained on testing of contaminants in raw materials using TLC, HPLC, GC, LCMS etc.
- Training of the manufacturers and private laboratory staff also will contribute significantly in testing contaminants in the raw materials.
- NCLs, Manufacturers and Private laboratories also may be encourage to develop test method for identification and quantification of contaminants the raw materials. WHO may collaborate with them to re-validate and acknowledge such test procedure.
To further develop capacity building in the region, the WHO was requested to facilitate the organisation of Inter-laboratory or proficiency testing for both the screening (TLC) and confirmatory (GC) testing methods.
Specific considerations for prioritized issues
To test excipients for contaminations with ethylene glycol (EG), diethylene glycol (DEG), national and regional pharmacopoeias provide test methods and specifications. The International Pharmacopoeia, in addition, describes in the monograph on Paracetamol oral solution a procedure to determine these contaminates in a finished pharmaceutical product.
To enable national quality control laboratories and other stakeholders to test and evaluate suspicious samples, the World Health Organization is developing a test strategy for DEG and EG in liquid preparation of oral use for inclusion in The International Pharmacopoeia. It is intended to use thin-layer chromatography for the screening of suspicious samples and gas or liquid chromatography for the confirmation of non-compliances.
According to the WHO good practices for pharmaceutical quality control laboratories (WHO good practices for pharmaceutical quality control laboratories, World Health Organization, Technical Report Series, No. 957, 2010) equipment for thin-layer chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatograph is recommended for first-stage pharmaceutical quality control laboratories, while gas chromatographs (with flame ionization) are proposed for medium-sized laboratories.
Member States are also encouraged to liaise with each other to urgently establish multiple memorandums of understanding (MoU) between National Control Laboratories, and WHO may facilitate as required. Such MoU should consider specifically address the number of samples to be tested, the cost of testing per sample, target analysis timeframes and requirements for information sharing.
These tests are not intended for manufacturers which should test each contained of each lot of incoming excipient with risk of EG/DEG contamination for identify and purity according to the relevant compendium or alternative acceptable techniques such as FTIR (Fourier transform infrared).
Series of regional workshops
Building on the above sources of information, a series of regional workshops was organised by SEARN to deepen the understanding of the challenges and build capacity in the region.
2–4 May 2023: Regional Workshop on Ensuring Quality of Medicines from Contaminated Substances Jakarta, Indonesia
A regional Workshop on Ensuring Quality of Medicines from Contaminated Substances was conducted in Jakarta, Indonesia, on 2–4 May 2023, in collaboration with Therapeutics Goods and Administration (TGA) and the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), to support Member States in protecting public health from contaminated medicines. This workshop allowed to develop tailored solutions to address the issue of the contaminated medicines in the region:
17-18 October 2023: Regional virtual workshop on testing methods for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol in oral liquid medicines for National Regulatory Authorities
A regional virtual workshop on testing methods for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol in oral liquid medicines for National Regulatory Authorities was organised on 17-18 October 2023. Attended by over 150 participants, it aimed to build adequate capacity in all Members States’ National Regulatory Authorities (NRA)/National Quality Control Laboratories (NQCL) for testing for ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol in liquid preparations for oral use.
The highlights are provided below:
NRAs can contact the secretariat to access the presentations, if needed.
15 February 2024: Regional virtual meeting on Ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol contaminations with National Regulatory Authorities (NRA) and the pharmaceutical industry identified by NRAs
A Regional virtual meeting on Ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol contaminations with National Regulatory Authorities (NRA) and the pharmaceutical industry identified by NRAs was organized on 15 February 2024. Attended by over 200 participants, the presentations and discussion highlighted a number of challenges and possible solutions.
The highlights can be accessed below:
22 February 2024: Regional virtual meeting on Ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol contaminations with poison centres and National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs)
A Regional virtual meeting on Ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol contaminations with poison centres, National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) and healthcare professionals’ associations identified by NRAs was organized on 22 February 2024. Attended by 50 participants, the presentations and discussion highlighted a number of challenges and possible solutions.
Recommendations
Recommendations to WHO
SEARN recommended WHO to:
- Consider restarting the rotational observed/coached inspection programme
- Develop WHO documentation on EG/DEG contaminations to support the efforts of poison centers, NRAs and pharmacovigilance centers to raise awareness on the possibility of such contamination and suspicious cases.
Recommendations to SEARN Members
SEARN recommended to its Members to:
- Implement a risk-based sampling strategy to address this issue, e.g. focusing on oral liquid medicines
- Consider the challenges and possible solutions highlighted by stakeholders at the national level.
- Participate in the Member State Mechanism on substandard and falsified medical products
- Continue engaging in the consultation for the review process of the WHO Scheme for the Certification of Pharmaceutical Starting Materials Moving in International Commerce (SMACS)